Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Extended-release (ER) formulations of the stimulant methylphenidate are commonly used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in both children and adults. Previous studies have shown that the clinical effectiveness of long-acting methylphenidate formulations is closely tied to the drug's pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, highlighting the need for consistency in drug exposure. ODX-methylphenidate ER uses an osmotic pump design to provide controlled release of drug over the course of the day. In these similarly designed 4-period replicate crossover studies, the PK profile of ODX-methylphenidate ER was compared to the reference product, osmotic release oral system (OROS)-methylphenidate ER, in healthy subjects in the fasted state. In the first trial (N = 60), a single 72-mg tablet of ODX-methylphenidate ER was compared to two 36-mg tablets of OROS-methylphenidate ER, while in the second trial (N = 36), a single 54-mg tablet of ODX-methylphenidate ER was compared to a 54-mg tablet of OROS-methylphenidate ER. The 2 studies had very comparable results, demonstrating similar PK parameters for the 2 products, including during the critical 7-12-hour postdose window. Statistical bioequivalence between the 2 formulations was confirmed for maximum drug concentration, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 3 hours after dosing (AUC), AUC from 3 to 7 hours after dosing, AUC from 7 to 12 hours after dosing, and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity in both trials. Safety and tolerability were similar for both products and in both trials, with no serious adverse events reported.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1577 | DOI Listing |