A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Treatment, outcomes, and resource utilization among patients with metastatic breast and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, by BRCA1/2 and HRD status. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are indicated for treatment of tumors with breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Little is known about differences in care by BRCA1/2 and HRD status for breast and ovarian cancers.

Methods: We investigated clinical characteristics, treatment, clinical outcomes, and health-care resource utilization by BRCA1/2 or HRD status among patients diagnosed between 2018-2020 with HER2-negative metastatic breast (mBC) and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aEOC) in the United States community healthcare setting.

Results: The study included 314 patients with mBC and 465 with aEOC. Patients with mBC carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation were younger and had a higher proportion of triple negative cancer than non-carriers (50% vs 38%). Only 8% of eligible patients received a PARPi in first-line (1L) and 18% in second-line (2L) of treatment for mBC. In aEOC, patients with HRD were younger and a higher proportion received 1L maintenance treatment with a PARPi than patients with non-HRD tumors (95% vs 66%). In aEOC, patients without HRD had greater healthcare resource use. Patients with BRCA-mutated tumors had poorer overall survival (OS); there were no differences in OS by HRD status in aEOC.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated differences in treatment by BRCA1/2 and HRD status. There was low PARPi uptake among patients with BRCA-mutated mBC but not among patients with aEOC. In aEOC, the cost to "treat all" may outweigh benefits; identifying patients without HRD likely to benefit from PARPis is needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342895PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hrd status
20
brca1/2 hrd
16
patients
12
aeoc patients
12
patients hrd
12
hrd
9
resource utilization
8
metastatic breast
8
advanced epithelial
8
epithelial ovarian
8

Similar Publications