Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Despite extensive research on general loneliness, existing scales overlook romantic loneliness as an independent construct, hindering the understanding of its psychological impact. The present study aimed to develop and validate a concise instrument to assess romantic loneliness: the Romantic Loneliness Scale (RomLon scale).
Method: The current research was conducted in a series of three consecutive phases involving 854 participants (M = 26.25 years, SD = 8.160; women = 64.9%). The validation of the RomLon scale involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and Rasch model analysis for item‒response theory, along with convergent, divergent, and predictive validity.
Results: The RomLon scale, comprising four items (English) in a single factor, demonstrated excellent reliability (α = 0.919; ICC = 0.963). The model fit indices, such as CFI (0.997), TLI (0.992), RMSEA (0.065), and SRMSR (0.009), showed strong validity. Convergent validity and divergent validity were demonstrated by the strong correlation (p < 0.001) of the scale with the UCLA Loneliness Scale (r = 0.383) and the psychosocial life satisfaction scale (r = -0.318), respectively. Romantic loneliness predicted hopelessness and sexual distress, was positively correlated with age and education, and was greater in men and married individuals than in women and unmarried individuals.
Conclusion: The RomLon scale fills a critical gap in psychological assessment by providing a reliable tool to measure romantic loneliness, which is distinct from general loneliness scales. Its strong psychometric properties make it valuable for research and clinical applications across diverse cultures, with implications for psychosocial health, life satisfaction, and relational wellbeing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12341205 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03208-8 | DOI Listing |