Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Balanced dual V1a/ V2 vasopressin receptor antagonism may offer potential advantages as an adjunctive and/or a replacement therapy to loop diuretic therapy.

Methods And Results: AVANTI was a double-blind, randomized trial in patients hospitalized with heart failure and residual congestion. In Part A, patients received pecavaptan or placebo as adjunctive therapy to standard of care for 30 days. In Part B, patients were randomized to continuation of furosemide or replacement by pecavaptan, as single diuretic therapies for 30 days. Co-primary endpoints were for Part A changes in weight and serum creatinine and for Part B, changes in weight and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio. Among 483 patients randomized into Part A, there was no difference in weight reduction between pecavaptan and placebo (between-group difference: -0.27 kg, upper one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.29, p = 0.21) and no effect on serum creatinine (between-group difference: 0.05 mg/dl, upper one-sided 95% CI 0.12, p = 0.87). Subsequently, 286 patients were randomized into Part B. The difference in weight change between the pecavaptan and furosemide monotherapy groups over 30 days was 0.69 kg (upper one-sided 80% CI 0.95, p = 0.16), satisfying non-inferiority criteria of 1 kg. The between-group difference in log-transformed change in blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio was -0.22 (upper one-sided 80% CI -0.19, p < 0.0001) favouring pecavaptan. Adverse events and serious adverse events related to congestion including heart failure hospitalizations were numerically higher in the pecavaptan groups in both parts of the trial.

Conclusions: Adjunctive pecavaptan for 30 days in patients with residual congestion had no impact on weight loss nor on renal function. Post-discharge pecavaptan monotherapy was non-inferior to furosemide monotherapy for weight change over 30 days, but was associated with improved renal function. The increase in congestion events suggests that future trials will need optimized background diuretic dosing.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03901729.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3801DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper one-sided
16
patients randomized
12
between-group difference
12
vasopressin receptor
8
heart failure
8
pecavaptan placebo
8
changes weight
8
serum creatinine
8
blood urea
8
urea nitrogen/creatinine
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: We developed a smartphone application capable of automatically measuring the hallux valgus angle (HVA) and various intermetatarsal angles by capturing radiographic images displayed on a monitor. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of these measurements using the application.

Methods: Three users-a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, a resident, and a nonhealthcare professional (Users 1, 2, and 3)-independently used the application to measure angles on 92 radiographs from 92 consecutive patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The optimal timing of complete revascularisation for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether immediate complete revascularisation was non-inferior to staged complete revascularisation during the index admission.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial at 14 hospitals in South Korea.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Balanced dual V1a/ V2 vasopressin receptor antagonism may offer potential advantages as an adjunctive and/or a replacement therapy to loop diuretic therapy.

Methods And Results: AVANTI was a double-blind, randomized trial in patients hospitalized with heart failure and residual congestion. In Part A, patients received pecavaptan or placebo as adjunctive therapy to standard of care for 30 days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Urinary catheterization is a routine practice during major surgery to aid fluid resuscitation and monitor hemodynamic stability. However, the optimal duration for catheter retention remains controversial due to associated complications like acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary tract infections (UTIs). This study evaluates whether immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic colectomy and upper rectal surgery is non-inferior to the conventional 24-hour removal protocol in terms of safety and efficacy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF