A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

An updated insight into the effect of β-adrenergic receptor antagonists (β-blockers) on respiratory function in asthma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: This study aimed to provide an updated assessment of the changes in respiratory function after β-adrenergic receptor antagonists (β-blockers) administration in asthma patients. The main assumption of the study was to use new methodological and statistical approaches not previously applied in this field in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Methods: To select studies, PubMed/Medline, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched. Additionally, Google Scholar was searched for gray literature. A systematic review and meta-analysis for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) and peak expiratory flow rate in asthma patients after administration of cardio-selective and non-selective β-blockers compared to placebo or baseline was performed. We also assessed FEV after topical β-blocker application compared to baseline.

Results: An independent subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly higher FEV in the placebo group (standardized mean difference [SMD] =-0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15, -0.34, P = 0.0003) than in non-selective β-blockers. The test for subgroup differences indicates that there is a statistically significant subgroup effect among cardio-selective and non-selective β-blockers (P = 0.03, = 80%). We also showed a statistically significant decrease in FEV (SMD = -0.70, 95% CI: [-1.56 to -0.03], P = 0.04) after topical β-blocker application.

Conclusion: Patients with asthma may tolerate cardio-selective β-blockers better than non-selective β-blockers. The FEV1 value depends on the type of β-blocker used. Cardio-selective β-blockers may be cautiously considered in patients with asthma only when strong cardiovascular indications exist (such as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or post-myocardial infarction) and with appropriate monitoring. At the same time, less risky therapeutic options should be chosen instead of topical β-blockers.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier 42024606876.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331582PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1582740DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-selective β-blockers
16
asthma patients
12
β-adrenergic receptor
8
receptor antagonists
8
β-blockers
8
antagonists β-blockers
8
respiratory function
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
cardio-selective non-selective
8

Similar Publications