Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
BACKGROUND Balance and physical stability are crucial for shooting athletes' performance, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potential noninvasive method to enhance motor learning and neuromuscular control. This study investigated the effects of tDCS combined with core stabilization training on balance, trunk imbalance, and shooting performance in university shooting athletes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty shooting athletes were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (active tDCS+core stabilization training) or the control group (sham tDCS+same training). Stimulation (2.0 mA for 20 minutes) was applied over the primary motor cortex. Both groups underwent 50-minute sessions 3 times a week for 5 weeks. Participants were blinded regarding whether they received real or sham stimulation, but the outcome evaluator was not blinded. Outcome measures (dynamic balance, sway distance, trunk imbalance, and shooting scores) were assessed before and after the intervention. RESULTS The experimental group showed significant improvements in dynamic balance (time, sway distance), trunk imbalance, lateral deviation, and shooting scores (P<0.05). The control group showed improvements mainly in dynamic balance (time) and trunk imbalance. Between-group comparisons demonstrated that the experimental group had greater improvements in balance parameters and shooting scores. Effect sizes for the experimental group ranged from 1.02 to 1.38 in key outcomes, indicating large effects. CONCLUSIONS Integrating tDCS with core stabilization training may be an effective approach to enhance balance, trunk imbalance, and shooting performance in shooting athletes. Further large-scale, long-term follow-up studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357522 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.949848 | DOI Listing |