Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Rationale And Objectives: We developed a machine learning model comprising morphological characteristics, enhancement dynamics, and extracellular volume (ECV) fractions for distinguishing malignant and benign small renal masses (SRMs), supporting personalised management.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective analysis involved 230 patients who underwent SRM resection with preoperative imaging, including 185 internal and 45 external cases. The internal cohort was split into training (n=136) and validation (n=49) sets. Histopathological evaluation categorised the lesions as renal cell carcinomas (n=183) or benign masses (n=47). Eleven multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) parameters, including the ECV fraction, were manually measured, along with clinical and laboratory data. Feature selection involved univariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularisation. Feature selection informed various machine learning classifiers, and performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and classification tests. The optimal model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
Results: The analysis included 183 carcinoma and 47 benign SRM cases. Feature selection identified seven discriminative parameters, including the ECV fraction, which informed multiple machine learning models. The Extreme Gradient Boosting model incorporating ECV exhibited optimal performance in distinguishing malignant and benign SRMs, achieving area under the curve values of 0.993 (internal training set), 0.986 (internal validation set), and 0.951 (external test set). SHAP analysis confirmed ECV as the top contributor to SRM characterisation.
Conclusion: The integration of multiphase contrast-enhanced CT-derived ECV fraction with conventional contrast-enhanced CT parameters demonstrated diagnostic efficacy in differentiating malignant and benign SRMs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.07.054 | DOI Listing |