A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A pilot study showcasing the difficulties in endoscopic biliary drainage using uncovered self-expanding metal stents for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) with plastic stent placement is the standard pertaining preoperative biliary drainage for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Uncovered self-expanding metal stents (ucSEMS) have shown better outcomes in palliative settings. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of direct ucSEMS placement ERCP for resectable pCCA.

Materials And Methods: In this single-centre pilot study, ten patients with presumed resectable pCCA (without prior drainage) underwent ERCP aiming to place an ucSEMS directly across the papilla into the future liver remnant (FLR). If the opposing liver segment was cannulated or had contrast injected, a stent was placed here too. Primary outcome was feasibility, defined as ucSEMS placement in the targeted liver segment without the need for additional drainage, with adequate bilirubin decrease according to the TOKYO criteria. Secondary outcomes included ERCP adverse events (AE) and successful stent removal during surgery.

Results: In 5 of the 10 included patients, direct ucSEMS placement in the FLR was technically successful, but one required additional intervention, resulting in 40% feasibility. All patients experienced ERCP-AE (five mild, five severe). Only two patients underwent hepatectomy, one after unsuccessful ERCP and one with successful ucSEMS removal during hepatectomy. Other patients did not proceed to hepatectomy due to ERCP-related AE ( = 3), disease progression ( = 2), or unresectability upon staging ( = 3).

Conclusion: Direct placement of ucSEMS for resectable pCCA showed limited feasibility and high AE rates. Its routine use is not justified without further refinement and larger studies to reduce AE and improve outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2542873DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pilot study
12
ucsems placement
12
biliary drainage
8
uncovered self-expanding
8
self-expanding metal
8
metal stents
8
resectable perihilar
8
perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
8
direct ucsems
8
resectable pcca
8

Similar Publications