A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Efficacy and safety of remote electrical neuromodulation in migraine: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Migraine is a disabling disorder characterized by recurrent severe headache attacks. Non-invasive neuromodulation can be employed in the prevention and/or acute treatment of migraine. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN), a type of non-invasive neuromodulation, is an effective and safe at-home treatment for migraine. It stimulates peripheral nerves in the upper arm to trigger conditioned pain modulation.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for clinical trials and observational studies that assess the efficacy of REN in patients with migraine attacks. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4.1 and Open Meta Analyst software.

Results: Our study included 12 studies with 9912 migraine patients. In the single-arm meta-analysis, 64% (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.65), and 22% (95% CI: 0.213 to 0.237) of patients experienced a reduction in pain and pain-free status at 2 h, respectively. Additionally, 59% (95% CI: 0.548 to 0.637), and 54% (95% CI: 0.471 to 0.609) of patients reported sustained pain relief and sustained pain-free status at 24 h, respectively. Marked functional improvement was achieved in 59% (95% CI: 0.577–0.607) of patients within 2 h post-treatment with REN, and 54.6% (95% CI: [0.519 to 0.574]) reported the disappearance of their most bothersome symptom (MBS). Device-related adverse events were reported in 0.4% (95% CI: 0.003 to 0.005) of patients. In double arm meta-analysis, pain-free status at 2 h had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.77 (95% CI: 1.63 to 4.71). While device-related adverse events had an OR of 1.45 (95%CI: 0.42 to 4.94).

Trial Registration: CRD42024596712

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335773PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04291-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain-free status
12
remote electrical
8
electrical neuromodulation
8
non-invasive neuromodulation
8
treatment migraine
8
95%
8
status 2 h
8
59% 95%
8
device-related adverse
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications