A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Beyond STEMI: High-risk ECG patterns as predictors of occlusive myocardial infarction in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background/aim: Immediate coronary angiography (CAG) is recommended for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, some occlusive myocardial infarctions (OMI) do not meet STEMI criteria. This study investigated whether additional ECG patterns beyond STEMI could more accurately identify OMI in OHCA patients, compared to using STEMI criteria alone.

Methods: This retrospective study categorised patients based on their first post-resuscitation ECG into two groups: STEMI and non-STEMI with high-risk ECG criteria and compared them for OMI by CAG.

Results: Among 97 patients OMI was identified in 55 % (53/97) of patients, specifically in 25 of 31 with STEMI (81 %), 24 of 29 with high-risk ECG (83 %), and 4 of 37 patients with neither (11 %). Combining STEMI and high-risk ECG criteria would have predicted OMI in 92 % (49/53) of cases. Patients with high-risk ECG experienced significantly longer median delays until CAG (101.5 [IQR 63-336.75] vs. 47.5 [25.75-71.25] minutes; p = 0.004) compared to those with STEMI on the ECG. Although 30-day mortality did not differ between STEMI and high-risk ECG patients (p = 0.973), survival-differences could be observed between groups. Syntax-I-Score was significantly higher in the high-risk ECG group (29 [IQR 19-38] vs. 15 [IQR 3-24.5]; p = 0.002).

Conclusion: Combining STEMI and high-risk ECG criteria improves OMI prediction compared to STEMI criteria alone, potentially enabling faster treatment and better OHCA survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110763DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high-risk ecg
32
stemi high-risk
16
stemi
12
stemi criteria
12
compared stemi
12
ecg criteria
12
ecg
11
patients
9
ecg patterns
8
occlusive myocardial
8

Similar Publications