A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Cochlear implantation in partial deafness: a case series with preoperatively substantial residual hearing at high frequencies. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To expand the current cochlear implant (CI) criteria to include patients with substantial preoperative residual hearing across low, medium, and high frequencies and to evaluate hearing preservation and performance after implantation.

Methods: Twelve patients aged 37-77 with preoperative hearing loss of 80 dB HL or better at 125-1500 Hz and 70 dB HL or better at 2000-8000 Hz underwent unilateral cochlear implantation. Pure tone audiometry (125-8000 Hz) was performed preoperatively and at 1, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Total hearing preservation (HP) was assessed using the HEARRING group formula. HP was also separately calculated for low-frequency (0.125-0.5 kHz), medium-frequency (0.75-1.5 kHz), and high-frequency (2-8 kHz) ranges. The monosyllabic word test was used to assess word recognition score (WRS) in free field preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

Results: One month after surgery, 84% of patients had complete or partial HP. High-frequency preservation yielded the best results, with 50% of patients achieving complete HP, while only 25% had complete HP in low and medium frequencies. In the long-term follow-up, gradual hearing deterioration was observed. At 24 months, the mean WRS benefit increased by 65% points in quiet and 51% points in noise, compared to preoperative hearing aid performance.

Conclusion: The study confirms that high-frequency hearing preservation is possible after CI surgery, and electrode implantation does not necessarily damage this region of the cochlea. Early implantation should be considered for patients with residual high-frequency hearing, especially when hearing aids are ineffective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09551-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearing preservation
12
hearing
10
cochlear implantation
8
residual hearing
8
high frequencies
8
low medium
8
preoperative hearing
8
preoperatively months
8
high-frequency hearing
8
patients
5

Similar Publications