98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: To integrate the quantitative and qualitative data collected as part of the PEACH (Procalcitonin: Evaluation of Antibiotic use in COVID-19 Hospitalised patients) study, which evaluated whether procalcitonin (PCT) testing should be used to guide antibiotic prescribing and safely reduce antibiotic use among patients admitted to acute UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals.
Design: Triangulation to integrate quantitative and qualitative data.
Setting And Participants: Four data sources in 148 NHS hospitals in England and Wales including data from 6089 patients.
Method: A triangulation protocol was used to integrate three quantitative data sources (survey, organisation-level data and patient-level data: data sources 1, 2 and 3) and one qualitative data source (clinician interviews: data source 4) collected as part of the PEACH study. Analysis of data sources initially took place independently, and then, key findings for each data source were added to a matrix. A series of interactive discussion meetings took place with quantitative, qualitative and clinical researchers, together with patient and public involvement (PPI) representatives, to group the key findings and produce seven statements relating to the study objectives. Each statement and the key findings related to that statement were considered alongside an assessment of whether there was agreement, partial agreement, dissonance or silence across all four data sources (convergence coding). The matrix was then interpreted to produce a narrative for each statement.
Objective: To explore whether PCT testing safely reduced antibiotic use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results: Seven statements were produced relating to the PEACH study objective. There was agreement across all four data sources for our first key statement, 'During the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing'. The second statement was related to this key statement, 'During the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing'. Partial agreement was found between data sources 3 (quantitative patient-level data) and 4 (qualitative clinician interviews). There were no data regarding safety from data sources 1 or 2 (quantitative survey and organisational-level data) to contribute to this statement. For statements three and four, 'PCT was not used as a central factor influencing antibiotic prescribing', and 'PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department (ED)/acute medical unit (AMU),' there was agreement between data source 2 (organisational-level data) and data source 4 (interviews with clinicians). The remaining two data sources (survey and patient-level data) contributed no data on this statement. For statement five, 'PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing in the intensive care unit (ICU)', there was disagreement between data sources 2 and 3 (organisational-level data and patient-level data) and data source 4 (clinician interviews). Data source 1 (survey) did not provide data on this statement. We therefore assigned dissonance to this statement. For statement six, 'There were many barriers to implementing PCT testing during the first wave of COVID-19', there was partial agreement between data source 1 (survey) and data source 4 (clinician interviews) and no data provided by the two remaining data sources (organisational-level data and patient-level data). For statement seven, 'Local PCT guidelines/protocols were perceived to be valuable', only data source 4 (clinician interviews) provided data. The clinicians expressed that guidelines were valuable, but as there was no data from the other three data sources, we assigned silence to this statement.
Conclusion: There was agreement between all four data sources on our key finding 'during the first wave of the pandemic (01/02/2020-30/06/2020), PCT testing reduced antibiotic prescribing'. Data, methodological and investigator triangulation, and a transparent triangulation protocol give validity to this finding.
Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN66682918.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336465 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093210 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med
August 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos; IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Background: Certain scientific publications suggest that medications with high protein binding, such as phenytoin, have lower-than-expected serum levels in patients receiving enteral nutrition (EN) preparations or nutritional supplements. Valproic acid (VPA) is highly protein bound but currently no interactions with EN that would reduce serum levels have been documented.
Case Description: A 69-year-old patient receiving enteral VPA oral solution via a nasojejunal tube experienced a clinically significant decrease in serum concentration when EN was initiated.
J Healthc Sci Humanit
January 2024
Formerly Associate Professor of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, Department of Pathobiology/Department of Graduate Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, Phone: (334) 524-1988, Email:
The COVID-19 pandemic is a highly infectious disease of paramount public health importance. COVID-19 is mainly transmitted via human-to-human contact. This could be through self-inoculation resulting from failure to observe proper hand hygiene and infection control practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Womens Dermatol
October 2025
Department of Dermatology, Palo Alto Foundation Medical Group, Mountain View, California.
Objective: To assess the safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) during pregnancy, specifically in relation to infant infection rates, vaccine efficacy, and vaccine-associated adverse events in infants exposed to TNFi in utero and through breast milk.
Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. The review included retrospective studies, prospective studies, and systematic reviews published until June 2024, focusing on TNFi exposure during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
HRB Open Res
April 2025
General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.
Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in Ireland, yet no national screening programme exists. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer mortality by approximately 20% in high-risk populations, its cost-effectiveness in Ireland remains uncertain. Evidence on the economic burden of lung cancer care and the feasibility of screening is needed to support policy decisions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Psychol
August 2025
Department of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Family socioeconomic status is broadly acknowledged to be associated with child development and wellbeing. However, the extent of this association across various dimensions of child development remains a topic of ongoing debate. This study aims to investigate the relationship between parental education and child cognitive and socioemotional skills, as well as the mediating role of children's leisure time activities, including screen time and shared book reading.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF