A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Evaluation of colonization factors of ETEC isolated from diarrheal patients in Bangladesh: A comparative approach using multiplex PCR and dot blot immunoassay. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) harbors colonization factors (CFs) to colonize the small intestine. In this study, as part of routine systematic ETEC surveillance in Bangladesh, we evaluated CFs from ETEC isolated from hospitalized diarrheal patients using a multiplex PCR assay for the first time, as the availability of the monoclonal antibodies for dot blot assay became limited. A total of 5914 diarrheal patients were enrolled during the study period (2023-2024), and a PCR assay, targeting heat-labile toxin (LT) and heat-stable toxin (ST), found 531 ETEC-infected patients. In our findings, 40 % of the ETEC isolates were positive for ST, followed by 38 % for LT + ST and 22 % for LT. The overall CF detection rate by using newly established multiplex PCR was 51 % among the ETEC-positive cases. CFA/I + CS21, CS6 ± CS21, CS5 + CS6, and CS1 + CS3 + CS21 were the most prevalent CFs in that period. For validation purposes, the multiplex PCR assay was compared to the conventional dot blot method, considered the gold standard. Both assays were used in parallel to assess the frequency of CFs detected in a subset of ETEC strains (n = 157). We observed a significant consistency between the dot blot and the PCR method. Additionally, compared to the dot blot method, the PCR assay identified CS21 in 11 % more ETEC strains harboring CFA/I or CS6. Overall, our findings suggest the multiplex PCR method is advantageous as well as time-efficient for detection of ETEC CFs compared to the dot blot assay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107215DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dot blot
24
multiplex pcr
20
pcr assay
16
diarrheal patients
12
colonization factors
8
etec
8
etec isolated
8
pcr
8
blot assay
8
blot method
8

Similar Publications