A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Implementation of and Testing in Patients With GI Cancer: A Prospective, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing pretreatment testing in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and its impact compared with a biobank population.

Materials And Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized implementation trial of pretreatment testing with preemptive dose reduction was conducted in patients initiating treatment with a fluoropyrimidine (FP, [fluorouracil or capecitabine]) or irinotecan. The primary end point was feasibility, defined as proportion of results available prior to cycle 1 of treatment. Secondarily, occurrence of severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), defined as toxicity resulting in hospitalization or emergency department visit, was compared with a biobank population receiving standard dose chemotherapy.

Results: Of the 288 patients prospectively tested, 225 (median age 60.7 years, 54% male, 18% Black, 47% colorectal cancer) received a qualifying chemotherapy. Eight of 11 DPYD variant carriers received an FP and eight of 39 UGT1A1 poor metabolizers received irinotecan. The median test turnaround time was 10 days (IQR, 9-13) with 57.4% of results available before cycle 1. Eleven of 16 (69%) participants with a drug-gene interaction (DGI) had results available before chemotherapy initiation and received pharmacogenetic-recommended dose reductions. Compared with the biobank cohort (n = 229), the prospective DGI group experienced fewer severe TRAEs (38% 65%, = .123), treatment discontinuations (31% 47%, = .356), and treatment modifications (38% 76%, = .028).

Conclusion: Pretreatment testing and dose reduction was feasible, enabling clinicians to make the appropriate chemotherapy dose reductions, reducing occurrence of adverse outcomes. testing is an important precision oncology approach to optimize patient safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352563PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00086DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pretreatment testing
12
compared biobank
12
testing patients
8
prospective nonrandomized
8
dose reduction
8
dose reductions
8
dose
5
implementation testing
4
patients
4
patients cancer
4

Similar Publications