Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Opioid-Free-Anesthesia (OFA) offers a valuable alternative model that challenges traditional opioid-based anesthesia practices. Recent studies have tempered expectations regarding the capacity of OFA techniques to improve quality of postoperative pain management and early recovery, in contrast with the clearly decreased risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Essentially based on regional anesthesia, non-opioid adjuvants and multimodal analgesia, OFA should be better viewed as a menu rather than a recipe, guided by surgical invasiveness, patient background, expected postoperative pain, and the practitioner's expertise. Potential concerns of OFA, including bradycardia and hypotension, are manageable with proper training and adapted dosing. Further multicentre trials and non-inferiority studies are needed to better define OFA's impact on patient-reported outcome and experiences measures in perioperative care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2542719 | DOI Listing |