Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we compared the clinical performance of the Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays in the context of cervical cancer screening. Clinical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated with 125 ≥CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) cases and 244 controls (≤CIN1). The genotype agreements between the assays were also evaluated for the case and control groups. The clinical sensitivities were 96.0% for Alinity m and cobas 6800 assays, and 95.2% for cobas 4800 assay. The clinical specificities observed were 67.6%, 68.0%, and 68.4% for Alinity m, cobas 6800, and cobas 4800 assays, respectively. Overall, the three HPV assays demonstrated similar clinical performance. In the ≥CIN3 group, genotype-specific positive agreement was ≥98.4% between Alinity m and cobas 4800 assays, and ≥85.7% between cobas 6800 and cobas 4800 assays. In the ≤CIN1 group, overall positive agreement among the three assays was ≥94.8%. This study showed similar clinical sensitivity and specificity for Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays. Alinity m was more specific in detecting HPV16 and HPV18, which could reduce unnecessary immediate referrals of women to colposcopy.IMPORTANCEThis study provides evidence that the Alinity m HR human papillomavirus (HPV) assay has similar clinical performance in comparison with the cobas 4800 HPV and cobas 6800 HPV, two widely used tests. Validation of HPV assays in a clinical setting is crucial to ensure that they can provide a balanced sensitivity and specificity for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, potentially improving patient management by enabling proper follow-up or treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403635PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00589-25DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cobas 4800
32
hpv cobas
28
cobas 6800
28
clinical performance
16
4800 hpv
16
6800 hpv
16
hpv assays
16
hpv
15
cobas
15
alinity hpv
12

Similar Publications

This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing among pregnant women in an urban teaching hospital in Malaysia. This cross-sectional study recruited pregnant women aged 30 years and above who attended antenatal care at the University of Malaya Medical Centre. Participants self-collected vaginal samples using FLOQSwabs and completed pre- and post-sampling questionnaires assessing acceptability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Effective triage of women testing positive for high-risk HPV DNA is essential to reduce unnecessary colposcopies while preserving cancer prevention. Cytology, the current standard, has limited specificity and reproducibility. The genotype-specific 7-type HPV E6/E7 mRNA test (PreTect HPV-Proofer'7), targeting HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, detects transcriptionally active infections and may enhance risk stratification.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Primary high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for cervical cancer screening due to its sensitivity and high negative predictive value. Most of the cervical cancers are caused by HPV16 and HPV18, and their presence has been used to guide patient management. Here, we compared the clinical performance of the Alinity m HR HPV, cobas 4800 HPV, and cobas 6800 HPV assays in the context of cervical cancer screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accuracy of self-collection versus cervical sampling for the molecular diagnosis of and in women attending gynecological services.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet

July 2025

Universidad Central del Ecuador Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Quito Ecuador Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.

Objective: Successful measures to address the increasing prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) require practical and accessible education and detection programs.

Methods: The ability to detect and may be hindered by a lack of adherence to proper cervical sampling. To address this, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of self-obtained samplings, such as self-collection and first-catch urine samples, to cervical samples taken by a practitioner using the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) cobas 4800 for and in 244 women attending gynecological services in Quito, Ecuador.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Numerous molecular tests are available to detect human papillomavirus (HPV). We compared the analytical performance of cobas and Anyplex for detection of high-risk (HR) carcinogenic HPV genotypes, assessed the composition of HPV types (other than 16 and 18) that influenced cobas performance, and considered the impact of viral load on test performance. We used data from the Early Detection of Cervical Cancer in Hard-to-Reach Populations of Women Through Portable and Point-of-Care HPV Testing project, which involved collection (2019-2022) of cervicovaginal samples from 1,042 women aged 21-74 years in Belgium ( = 244), Portugal ( = 309), Brazil ( = 244), and Ecuador ( = 245).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF