Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Despite advances in imaging diagnostics, the histological confirmation of suspected carcinoma through prostate core needle biopsy remains essential for treatment planning. Diagnosis is based on established morphological criteria such as architectural disturbances, cellular atypia, and loss of the basal cell layer. In addition to the most common acinar prostate carcinoma, various subtypes and rare histological patterns exist, which must be differentiated from benign mimickers. Immunohistochemical methods support diagnostic accuracy but should be carefully interpreted in the context of morphology. Tumor extent in core biopsy specimens should preferably be reported in millimeters. Diagnostic uncertainties can be coded as atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) or atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP) to facilitate appropriate clinical interpretation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00292-025-01455-5 | DOI Listing |