Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: This study aimed to estimate genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer (PCa) by constructing a polygenic risk score (PRS) using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified from genome-wide association studies.
Materials And Methods: The study included 1,015 PCa patients from our institutions and 1,015 age-matched controls from the Taiwan Biobank (TWB). An independent external validation cohort of 188 PCa patients and 188 TWB controls (excluding those from the primary cohort) was assembled. DNA was extracted from blood samples, with approximately 690,000 SNPs genotyped (minor allele frequency ≥0.05) and 15 million additional SNPs imputed using the 1000 Genomes Project. After quality control, 958 PCa patients and 999 controls were included in the analysis. The PRS was developed using PRSice2 by dividing samples into a base dataset and a model-testing set. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and cross-validation (CV).
Results: Of the 87,092 SNPs initially considered, 24 were used to construct the PRS, located in intronic regions of genes such as , , and . The PRS significantly improved PCa prediction, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.824 (p=1.23×10⁻⁵⁰). Patients in the top 25th percentile of PRS had a 34-fold higher risk compared to those in the bottom 25th percentile (odds ratio=34.37, 95% confidence interval=22.93-51.68, p=1.96×10⁻⁵². The model showed stable performance with mean accuracies of 0.75 (3-fold CV) and 0.76 (10-fold CV) and achieved an AUC of 0.757 in the independent validation cohort.
Conclusions: The developed PRS showed robust predictive ability for PCa in the Taiwanese population and may inform future risk stratification and personalized interventions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.250056 | DOI Listing |