Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary arterial compliance (PAC)-the two primary components of right ventricular (RV) afterload-are interdependent and exhibit an inverse relationship. However, their variations across pulmonary hypertension subtypes and between rest and exercise remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the PVR-PAC relationship at rest and during exercise in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Fifty-seven patients with IPAH and 227 patients with CTEPH with near-normal mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP; <30 mmHg) and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP; <15 mmHg) at rest underwent a symptom-limited exercise test using a supine cycle ergometer with right heart catheterization. Patients with CTEPH were older and had a lower TAPSE/systolic PAP ratio compared with patients with IPAH. At both rest and peak exercise, patients with CTEPH demonstrated higher PAWP and lower [Formula: see text] and cardiac output than patients with IPAH. Despite no significant difference in PVR, PAC was lower in CTEPH (rest: 2.5 [1.9, 3.7] vs. 3.5 [2.6, 4.8] mL/mmHg, < 0.001; peak: 1.8 [1.3, 2.2] vs. 2.4 [1.8, 2.8] mL/mmHg, < 0.001), as was the resistance compliance (RC) time constant (rest: 0.37 [0.29, 0.44] vs. 0.50 [0.40, 0.64] s, < 0.001; peak: 0.23 [0.19, 0.29] vs. 0.34 [0.24, 0.40] s, < 0.001). The PVR-PAC curve in CTEPH was leftward-shifted compared with IPAH ( < 0.001). In both groups, the PVR-PAC curve in peak exercise shifted further leftward compared with rest ( < 0.001). Despite similar PVR levels, patients with CTEPH experience greater afterload to RV from rest to exercise compared with those with IPAH, revealing subtype-specific differences in RV afterload. This study is the first to characterize exercise-induced changes in the PVR-PAC relationship in IPAH and CTEPH. Despite similar PVR, patients with CTEPH showed significantly lower PAC and RC time constant at rest and during exercise. A leftward shift in the inverse PVR-PAC relationship in CTEPH highlights the importance of assessing both PAC and PVR under stress for accurate clinical assessment and tailored management for each subtype of PH.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00477.2025 | DOI Listing |