A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Children with diabetes and at least one non-autoimmune feature should be considered for monogenic diabetes testing. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Monogenic diabetes testing in children currently targets Maturity Onset Diabetes in the Young (MODY) or recognised genetic syndromes. We aim to determine whether genetic testing for monogenic diabetes should be performed for all children with diabetes and at least one non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic feature (syndromic diabetes).

Methods: We recruited 183 children with diabetes and at least one non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic feature (50% (n=91) with self-reported consanguinity). We measured islet-autoantibodies and type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (T1DGRS) and used targeted next generation sequencing to analyse all known causes of monogenic diabetes.

Results: 33% (61/183) of children had confirmed monogenic diabetes. Of these, 84% (51/61) had recessive aetiologies with variants in WFS1 (46%), SLC19A2 (12%) and SLC29A3 (12%) being most common. Monogenic cases compared to non-monogenic had similar age of diagnosis (7.4 vs 6, p=0.1) and BMI z-score (-0.08 vs -0.41, p=0.3) but had higher parental consanguinity (62% vs 19%, p=0.01) and features in multiple organ systems (53% vs 28%, p=0.01). Only 59% reported well recognised features of their associated genetic syndrome. Children with low T1DGRS (<50th centile of T1D population) and negative/untested antibodies were more likely to have monogenic cause compared to positive antibodies or negative/untested antibodies and a high T1DGRS (≥ 50th centile) (48% vs 3% vs 7%, p<0.0001).

Interpretation: Children with diabetes and at least one non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic feature should be considered for monogenic diabetes testing. Measurement of islet-autoantibodies and T1DGRS help prioritise genetic testing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf430DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monogenic diabetes
16
children diabetes
12
diabetes non-autoimmune
12
diabetes
8
diabetes testing
8
non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic
8
extra-pancreatic feature
8
children
6
monogenic
6
non-autoimmune feature
4

Similar Publications