98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Aims: Speech-language pathologists actively participate in the assessment of pragmatics in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, in Portugal, there is a shortage of valid and reliable instruments to assess this domain in detail. Therefore, it was deemed relevant to help validate the (EAC) (Communicative Skills Assessment Scale) in this population.
Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was conducted. The sample included 97 children, aged between 4 and 7 years and 11 months, diagnosed with ASD with European Portuguese as their native language. As an exclusion criterion, the co-occurrence of intellectual developmental disorder was defined. The internal consistency of the EAC was analyzed through the calculation of Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability through the calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Convergent validity was also analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Results: The EAC presented a high internal consistency value, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. The test-retest reliability analysis (n = 27) revealed good stability in the participants' responses at both assessment moments, with ICC values varying between 0.642 and 0.842. In the study of convergent validity, statistically significant correlations were observed between the EAC total score and the two scales of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Portuguese Version (SDQ-Por): relationship problems with colleagues (r = -0.273; < .01) and prosocial behavior (r = 0.606; < .01).
Conclusion: The EAC presents good reliability and validity for children with ASD, suggesting its adequacy as a research and clinical tool for testing pragmatics within this population.
Implications: This study will improve clinical decision making regarding ASD and guide future research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304631 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23969415251362626 | DOI Listing |
J Prof Nurs
September 2025
College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 566 KMBL, Provo, UT 84602, United States of America.
Background: Formal mentoring within the nursing profession has been recognized as an effective approach in teaching critical thinking, leadership skills, communication, and professional socialization. Unfortunately, few baccalaureate nursing programs teach skills specific to mentoring, both as mentees and mentors within a formalized program.
Methods: A peer mentoring program with senior students mentoring sophomore students was developed based on Benner's (1984) novice-to-expert theory during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background: Empathy, communication, problem-solving, and ethical decision-making are crucial for nursing students to deliver holistic, patient-centered care. Traditional teaching methods may fall short, highlighting the need for innovative approaches like creative drama.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of creative drama on the empathy, communication, problem-solving, and ethical decision-making skills of nursing students, guided by Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory and Bandura's Social Learning Theory.
J Prof Nurs
September 2025
University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, United States of America. Electronic address:
Background: Failure to fail involves assigning passing grades to students who have not achieved course or clinical objectives at a satisfactory level. The literature has shown that this phenomenon occurs more frequently in the clinical setting due to several issues, including the increased subjectivity of clinical evaluation tools and processes, unclear policies, and lack of administrative support to fail students. The question remains: What is the thought process that is used by faculty to determine if a student passes or fails in a clinical experience?
Purpose: To explore the decision-making process used by pre-licensure clinical nursing faculty when they are determining whether to pass or fail an unsafe student enrolled in a clinical course.
Clin Pediatr (Phila)
September 2025
Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
HealthySteps is an evidence-based, prevention program for families of children ages 0 to 3 integrated into pediatric primary care. Our objective was to synthesize feedback on local implementation of an enhanced HealthySteps+ program from various stakeholder viewpoints to improve implementation. Qualitative data were gathered from HealthySteps+ team members (n = 14), current clinic staff (n = 15), and a focus group of parents serving on the program's advisory committee (n = 7).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF