98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: We biomechanically compared three anterolateral procedures (artificial-anterolateral ligament [ALL] reconstruction, autologous-ALL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis [LET]) in knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral complex (ALC) injuries when combined with nonanatomic artificial ACL reconstruction.
Methods: Eight cadaveric knees were tested robotically at time-zero: (1) intact, (2) ACL + ALC deficient, (3) ACL reconstruction + artificial-ALL reconstruction, (4) ACL reconstruction + autologous-ALL reconstruction, (5) ACL reconstruction+LET. Each state was tested under 3 loads: (1) a 89N anterior tibial (AT) loading to test AT translation (ATT) at full extension (FE), 30°, 60° and 90°, (2) a 5N·m internal rotation (IR) tibial torque to test tibial IR at FE, 15°, 30° and 45°, (3) a simulated pivot-shift test consisting of a combined 5 N·m IR tibial torque and 7 N·m valgus load to test ATT and IR at FE, 15°, 30° and 45°.
Results: ACL + ALC deficiency impaired anteroposterior and rotational knee stability across all conditions. Under 89 N AT loading, the anterior instability was fully restored by ACL reconstruction + artificial-ALL reconstruction (n.s.) and partially by ACL reconstruction + autologous-ALL reconstruction and ACL reconstruction + LET, with significant differences from the intact state at 30° (p = 0.019) and 60° (p = 0.011) in the ACL reconstruction + autologous-ALL reconstruction state and at 30° (p = 0.032) and 60° (p = 0.018) in the ACL reconstruction+LET state. Under 5 N·m IR tibial torque, the internal rotational instability was fully restored by ACL reconstruction+artificial-ALL reconstruction and ACL reconstruction + LET (n.s.) and partially by ACL reconstruction + autologous-ALL reconstruction, with significant differences from the intact state at FE (p = 0.044) and 15° (p = 0.049). During simulated pivot-shift testing, all three procedures fully restored native kinematics with no significant differences observed (n.s.).
Conclusions: Artificial-ALL reconstruction, autologous-ALL reconstruction, and LET similarly restored native knee kinematics in ACL + ALC deficient knees when combined with artificial ACL reconstruction at time-zero.
Level Of Evidence: Level V, laboratory study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12811 | DOI Listing |
Clin J Sport Med
September 2025
Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Objective: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) leads to high rates of knee post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Physical activity may mitigate PTOA risk but levels after ACLR have not been extensively studied. We aimed to review self-reported and device-measured physical activity levels in individuals with ACLR and compare them with international guidelines, and with uninjured controls.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Department of Sports Medicine, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Department of Sport Orthopaedics, TUM University Clinic, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of Kaplan fibres (KF), anterolateral ligament (ALL) and lateral meniscus (LM) injuries on preoperative anterolateral rotational instability (ALRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees. It was hypothesised that injuries to the ALC (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Clinique du sport, Paris, France.
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus ACLR + lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) at mid-term follow-up in a low activity population based on the Tegner activity scale (TAS ≤ 4).
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis comparing patients with a pre-injury TAS ≤ 4 who underwent primary isolated ACLR versus ACLR + LEAPs between 2012 and 2022. Propensity score matching based on age, sex, and presence of meniscal injury was used to establish two groups: ACLR alone and ACLR with LEAP.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Purpose: Modifying interference screw composition may ensure better osteoconductive properties in order to reduce tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The primary and secondary purposes were to evaluate tunnel and screw volume changes in poly-L-lactide acid (PLLA) and poly-D-lactic acid + hydroxyapatite + β-tricalcium phosphate (PLDLA+) screws. The tertiary purpose was to compare patient reported- and functional outcomes between PLLA and PLDLA+ group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF