A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

From promise to practice: a scoping review of AI applications in abdominal radiology. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

AI is rapidly transforming abdominal radiology. This scoping review mapped current applications across segmentation, detection, classification, prediction, and workflow optimization based on 432 studies published between 2019 and 2024. Most studies focused on CT imaging, with fewer involving MRI, ultrasound, or X-ray. Segmentation models (e.g., U-Net) performed well in liver and pancreatic imaging (Dice coefficient 0.65-0.90). Classification models (e.g., ResNet, DenseNet) were commonly used for diagnostic labeling, with reported sensitivities ranging from 52 to 100% and specificities from 40.7 to 99%. A small number of studies employed true object detection models (e.g., YOLOv3, YOLOv7, Mask R-CNN) capable of spatial lesion localization, marking an emerging trend toward localization-based AI. Predictive models demonstrated AUCs between 0.62 and 0.99 but often lacked interpretability and external validation. Workflow optimization studies reported improved efficiency (e.g., reduced report turnaround and scan repetition), though standardized benchmarks were often missing. Major gaps identified include limited real-world validation, underuse of non-CT modalities, and unclear regulatory pathways. Successful clinical integration will require robust validation, practical implementation, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05144-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scoping review
8
abdominal radiology
8
workflow optimization
8
promise practice
4
practice scoping
4
review applications
4
applications abdominal
4
radiology rapidly
4
rapidly transforming
4
transforming abdominal
4

Similar Publications