Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
This study compared postprandial glycemia with faster-acting insulin aspart (FiAsp) versus insulin aspart delivered by advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) according to varying meal composition, time of day, and premeal bolus dose estimation in adults with type 1 diabetes. Participants received 11 weeks of insulin aspart and FiAsp in sequence, delivered by the MiniMedâ„¢ 780G AHCL algorithm, and within each period ingested 12 standardized meals. Test meals, containing 60 g of carbohydrate but varying by fat and protein content (high fat low protein [HFLP], high fat high protein [HFHP], and low fat low protein [LFLP]), were each eaten in the morning and evening and with a full bolus or 50% reduction. The primary outcome was continuous glucose monitoring time in range (%TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) 4 h postmeal for FiAsp versus insulin aspart. Twelve participants (mean [standard deviation or SD] age 48 (13) years; 58% male; HbA1c 6.7 (0.7)%/50 (7) mmol/mol) were recruited. When all meal types, timing, and bolus conditions were combined, FiAsp tended to have greater glucose TIR compared with insulin aspart (mean difference = 5.17% [-0.09, 10.43]; = 0.054), with differences most apparent for morning meals. Insulin formulation did not impact outcomes with full versus 50% premeal bolus or meal composition. HFLP meals resulted in the greatest TIR, followed by HFHP and lowest for LFLP (83.7% [19.6] vs. 74.7% [26.9] vs. 62.0% [23.1], respectively, mean [SD], < 0.01). For adults with type 1 diabetes who are susceptible to morning hyperglycemia, FiAsp delivered by AHCL and higher fat content of meals may help improve postprandial glycemic outcomes. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12619001340123.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15209156251362500 | DOI Listing |