A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Heterogeneous and differential treatment effect analysis of safety improvements on freeways using causal inference. | LitMetric

Heterogeneous and differential treatment effect analysis of safety improvements on freeways using causal inference.

Accid Anal Prev

Centre for Transport Engineering and Modelling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Evaluating safety effectiveness of freeway design improvements is crucial for enhancing overall safety and confirming the efficacy of specific measures implemented. Limited research has addressed treatment heterogeneities that influence crash outcomes, and previous studies have often been susceptible to confounding biases, which may distort causal inference results. To mitigate confounding biases and establish reliable causal relationships between crashes and treatment interventions, this study employed a causal forest (CF) model to assess the safety efficacy of freeway exit improvements - including lane control, traffic signs, speed-limit signs, and crash attenuators - on freeways in Suzhou, China. We compared naïve and empirical Bayes before-after methods against the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) estimated by the CF approach. Geometric design and traffic operation characteristics were then considered in measuring the Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE) of these improvements, with the aim of identifying road features where treatment benefits were most pronounced. Additionally, a Differential Treatment Effects (DTE) analysis within a causal framework was employed to estimate treatment effects on the residuals, uncovering more intricate and complex causal relationships. The study demonstrated that CF method provides more stable ATE estimates. An analysis of the distribution of the treatment effects revealed a diverse range of impacts, indicating both positive and negative outcomes. Significant variability in treatment effects was evident from heterogeneous testing results. Noteworthy outcomes from treating freeway exits were observed in areas with an Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) ranging from 12,000 to 28,000 vehicles per day, average speeds of 95 km/h and above, two or four lanes on each side, and an exit-only ramp configuration. These findings contribute to valuable technical insights for selecting and evaluating safety enhancement strategies on freeways.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108173DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment effects
20
treatment
10
differential treatment
8
causal inference
8
evaluating safety
8
confounding biases
8
causal relationships
8
causal
6
safety
5
effects
5

Similar Publications