A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A novel CAT method for QoL screening: proof-of-principle study with comparisons to standard methods. | LitMetric

A novel CAT method for QoL screening: proof-of-principle study with comparisons to standard methods.

Qual Life Res

Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15780, 1001 NG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Published: July 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: This proof-of-principle study investigated a novel Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) method termed Latent-class and Sum score based Computerized Adaptive Testing (LSCAT), developed for screening purposes. LSCAT was assessed for its ability to accurately predict depression symptoms during health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) screenings.

Methods: LSCAT's performance was compared with two benchmark CAT methods, Stochastic Curtailment (SC) and Decision Tree based Computer Adaptive Testing (DTCAT), using data from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

Results: LSCAT consistently outperformed both SC and DTCAT in terms of predictive accuracy, achieving the lowest rates of Type I error. Furthermore, LSCAT's Type II error rates were at least as low as those of SC and significantly lower than those of DTCAT across all simulation scenarios.

Conclusion: These results suggest that LSCAT is a promising method for developing valid and efficient screening tools in HR-QoL research and practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04035-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adaptive testing
12
cat method
8
proof-of-principle study
8
computer adaptive
8
type error
8
novel cat
4
method qol
4
qol screening
4
screening proof-of-principle
4
study comparisons
4

Similar Publications