A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Validation of machine learning angiography-derived physiological pattern of coronary artery disease. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: The classification of physiological patterns of coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for clinical decision-making, significantly affecting the planning and success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). This study aimed to develop a novel index to reliably interpret and classify physiological CAD patterns based on virtual pullbacks from single-view Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) analysis.

Methods And Results: The pullback pressure gradient index (PPGi) was used to classify CAD patterns, with a cut-off value of PPGi = 0.78 distinguishing focal from diffuse and non-focal disease. The machine learning methods using penalized logistic regression and random forest were proposed to assess CAD patterns. Scores derived from multivariate functional principal component analysis of μFR and quantitative coronary analysis improved model performance. Expert panel interpretations served as the reference. A total of 343 vessels (291 patients) underwent classification. The PPGi cut-off of 0.78 achieved 67% accuracy [95% confidence interval (CI): 66-68%] for focal vs. diffuse and 76% accuracy (95% CI: 75-76%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. The penalized logistic regression model, including PPGi as a feature, provided superior accuracy: 88% (95% CI: 87-88%) for focal vs. diffuse and 81% (95% CI: 80-81%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. Moreover, the random forest model with PPGi as one of the features was applied for multiclass classification, providing an accuracy of 73% (95% CI: 73-73%).

Conclusion: The machine learning models for physiological patterns of CAD classification outperformed the binary PPGi method, providing robust and generalizable classification across different study populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282386PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning
12
cad patterns
12
focal diffuse
12
coronary artery
8
artery disease
8
physiological patterns
8
penalized logistic
8
logistic regression
8
random forest
8
focal non-focal
8

Similar Publications