Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
Background: Combining two oral therapies with different mechanisms could be an attractive treatment strategy for multiple sclerosis (MS) to increase efficacy; however, evidence of such efficacy and safety is lacking.
Objectives: The phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled POINT study evaluated efficacy and safety of ponesimod 20 mg versus placebo as an add-on therapy to ongoing dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment in patients with active relapsing MS despite DMF monotherapy.
Methods: Patients (18-55 years) were randomized (1:1) to ponesimod+DMF or placebo+DMF orally once-daily for ≤156 weeks. Primary endpoint was annualized relapse rate (ARR) at end-of-study (EOS). Secondary endpoints were 12-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA), time-to-first confirmed relapse, and number of combined unique active lesions (CUALs) on brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at EOS.
Results: The study was prematurely terminated due to slow recruitment; of 600 planned patients, 136 (23 %; [ponesimod: n = 68, placebo: n = 68]) were randomized. Primary endpoint (ARR) was not met (rate ratio, ponesimod+DMF versus placebo+DMF: 1.2; p = 0.5252). Ponesimod+DMF group showed a lower mean number of CUALs/year (rate ratio: 0.37; p = 0.0072). Other efficacy outcomes did not differ between the treatment groups. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable between groups (ponesimod+DMF: 48 [71.6 %]; placebo+DMF: 53 [77.9 %]); dizziness was the most commonly reported AE in the ponesimod+DMF group (10.4 %).
Conclusions: This terminated study did not demonstrate the superiority of ponesimod+DMF on clinical efficacy endpoints. In the exploratory analysis ponesimod+DMF versus DMF alone appeared associated with a lower disease activity as assessed by MRI. No new safety signals were reported for ponesimod+DMF.
Gov Identifier: NCT02907177 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02907177.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2025.106616 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Nurses' Self-Reported Practices and Prescribers' Expectations in Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Hospitalised Patients: A Survey Study and Clinical Documentation Review.
J Adv Nurs
September 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Aims: To assess self-reported practices and knowledge of nurses and prescribers (i.e., physicians and nurse practitioners) on intravenous fluid therapy, and to evaluate how this is documented through a clinical documentation review.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWhere we Live matters: Varied Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns in Psoriatic Arthritis in the United States.
Arthritis Rheumatol
September 2025
Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, social deprivation, insurance coverage, and medication use across regional subsets of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the US.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of PsA patients in the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry between January 2020 and March2023 was conducted. Distribution of high disease activity (HDA - RAPID3>12), high comorbidity (RxRisk ≥90 percentile), high Area Deprivation Index (ADI ≥80), insurance coverage, prednisone ≥10mg daily, and all DMARD therapies across geographic regions were evaluated.
Response to Comment on: a case series of patients with β- thalassemia trait and iron overload: from multifactorial hepcidin suppression to treatment with mini-phlebotomies.
Haematologica
September 2025
Department of Medicine, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy; Veneto Region Referral Center for Iron Disorders and European Reference Network Center for Rare Hematological Diseases "EuroBloodNet".
Not available.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIGLV3-21-directed bispecific antibodies activate T cells and promote killing in a high-risk subset of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Haematologica
September 2025
Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Laboratory of Translational Immuno-Oncology, Department of Biomedicine, University and University Hospital Basel, Basel.
We previously used a disease-specific B cell receptor (BCR) point mutation (IGLV3-21R110) for selective targeting of a high-risk subset of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Since CLL is a disease of the elderly and a significant fraction of patients is not able to physically tolerate CAR T cell treatment, we explored bispecific antibodies as an alternative for precision targeting of this tumor mutation. Heterodimeric IgG1-based antibodies consisting of a fragment crystallizable region (Fc) attached to both an anti-IGLV3-21R110 Fab and an anti-CD3 (UCHT1) single chain variable fragment (R110-bsAb) selectively killed cell lines engineered to express high levels of the neoepitope as well as primary CLL cells using healthy donor and CLL patient-derived T cells as effectors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEarly cytokine and chemokine signals shape the anti-AML activity of bispecific engager-secreting T cells.
Haematologica
September 2025
Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD,.
Immunotherapies, including cell therapies, are effective anti-cancer agents. However, cellular product persistence can be limiting with short functional duration of activity contributing to disease relapse. A variety of manufacturing protocols are used to generate therapeutic engineered T-cells; these differ in techniques used for T-cell isolation, activation, genetic modification, and other methodology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF