Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Current automatic software uses a fixed apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) threshold (≤620×10⁻⁶ mm²/s) to quantify stroke volume before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Clinically, infarcts are visually detected by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensity coupled with ADC hypointensity, which encompasses a broad range of ADC values, often exceeding the threshold. We investigated the clinical significance of large discrepancies between DWI hyperintense volumes and ADC ≤620×10⁻⁶ mm²/s volumes (DWI-ADC mismatch) on pre-EVT MRI.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included consecutive patients with first-ever acute ischemic stroke who underwent EVT for symptomatic anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 24 hours (January 2018-January 2020) and had high-quality pre- and post-EVT MRI. DWI-ADC mismatch was defined as a ratio of DWI hyperintense volume to ADC ≤620×10⁻⁶ mm²/s volume of ≥2. Demographics, clinical characteristics, procedural details, and outcomes were compared between mismatch and no-mismatch groups.
Results: Of 73 patients included, 20 (27.4%) had DWI-ADC mismatch. The mismatch group showed slower infarct growth (3.8 vs 7.5 mL/hour, P=0.04), significantly more parent artery stenosis (65% vs 20.8%, P<0.001), and a greater need for angioplasty/stenting (45% vs 17%, P=0.013). Imaging analysis showed a higher DWI reversal percentage (37.7% vs 21.2%, P=0.02) and a trend towards a lower ADC lowering percentage (25.3% vs 32.2%, P=0.05). Other characteristics were comparable.
Conclusions: Pre-EVT DWI-ADC mismatch identifies patients with slower infarct progression, distinct procedural requirements, and a higher likelihood of tissue reversal. Recognizing this pattern may improve EVT planning and optimize outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023702 | DOI Listing |