A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning improves temporal characteristics of the cutaneous microvascular responses to postocclusive reactive hyperemia. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Repeated remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) improves endothelial-dependent cutaneous vasodilation. However, the role of repeated RIPC on the postocclusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) response in the cutaneous microvasculature is unknown; here, we assessed whether repeated RIPC would increase PORH responses. Thirty participants (23 ± 3 yr old) performed either repeated RIPC (1 session/day for a week, = 10 or 12 sessions over 2 wk, = 12) or 2-wk control ( = 8). Each RIPC session comprised 4 repetitions of 5-min arm blood flow occlusion interspersed by 5-min reperfusion. PORH was elicited by brachial artery occlusion for 5 min. Cutaneous vascular conductance was determined using laser speckle contrast imaging before and after the repeated RIPC. The control group did not receive RIPC but underwent the PORH measurements 2 wk later. Area under the curve and peak of PORH were not different. Max/Time to Peak, the maximum hyperemia achieved (Max) over the rate of reperfusion following arterial occlusion (Tp), improved similarly after both 1 and 2 wk of repeated RIPC (1 wk: 0.09 ± 0.04 vs. 0.12 ± 0.07, 2 wk: 0.12 ± 0.03 vs. 0.14 ± 0.04 CVC/s, Pre vs. Post, < 0.05). Tp improved only after 2 wk of RIPC (Tp: 16.5 ± 2.1 vs. 14.8 ± 2.4 s, Pre vs. Post, < 0.05). The control group responses did not change after 2 wk. Repeated RIPC did not increase the magnitude of the hyperemic response but did alter temporal measures of PORH such as Max/Tp and Tp following cuff deflation. This study investigated the extent to which ) repeated RIPC improved PORH-induced cutaneous microvascular reactivity and ) a longer period of RIPC further improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity. Both 1 and 2 wk of RIPC improved cutaneous microvascular reactivity similarly. However, only 2 wk of RIPC altered temporal PORH variables. These results suggest that repeated RIPC increases cutaneous microvascular reactivity following occlusion, but longer duration RIPC may be needed to alter temporal cutaneous microvascular reactivity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00069.2025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

repeated ripc
32
cutaneous microvascular
24
microvascular reactivity
20
ripc
16
ripc improved
12
repeated
10
cutaneous
9
repeated remote
8
remote ischemic
8
ischemic preconditioning
8

Similar Publications