A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

What guides regional nodal irradiation in node positive breast cancer following upfront sentinel lymph node biopsy? | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate decision-making patterns among international experts regarding breast cancer regional node irradiation (RNI), using an objective, consensus-driven approach.

Methods: Twenty-one international radiation oncology experts were invited to participate in a consensus-based evaluation of RNI recommendations. Participants provided responses to clinical scenarios involving early-stage breast (cN0) cancer with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB)-positive findings (pN1a) without completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Decision-making parameters, including patient age, tumour characteristics, and biological risk factors were analysed.

Findings: Of the 21 experts, 19 completed the evaluation. Responses included 22 different decision-making criteria and demonstrated considerable variability in decision-making, even after simplifying treatment options. Consensus was most frequently observed in high- and low-risk cases, with comprehensive RNI or omission of RNI being recommended, respectively. However, for intermediate-risk scenarios, no clear agreement was reached reflecting different clinical considerations and assessment of risk factors.

Interpretation: Due to many randomised studies investigating different risk factors that do not always coincide, breast cancer experts rely on a wide variety of criteria to recommend RNI for pN1(sn) breast cancer, leading to heterogeneity in decision-making. With this work we aim to raise awareness of this challenge to provoke revision of current guidelines and expert-based recommendations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111055DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
16
lymph node
12
sentinel lymph
8
risk factors
8
node
5
breast
5
cancer
5
decision-making
5
rni
5
guides regional
4

Similar Publications