Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: This study aimed to evaluate decision-making patterns among international experts regarding breast cancer regional node irradiation (RNI), using an objective, consensus-driven approach.
Methods: Twenty-one international radiation oncology experts were invited to participate in a consensus-based evaluation of RNI recommendations. Participants provided responses to clinical scenarios involving early-stage breast (cN0) cancer with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB)-positive findings (pN1a) without completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Decision-making parameters, including patient age, tumour characteristics, and biological risk factors were analysed.
Findings: Of the 21 experts, 19 completed the evaluation. Responses included 22 different decision-making criteria and demonstrated considerable variability in decision-making, even after simplifying treatment options. Consensus was most frequently observed in high- and low-risk cases, with comprehensive RNI or omission of RNI being recommended, respectively. However, for intermediate-risk scenarios, no clear agreement was reached reflecting different clinical considerations and assessment of risk factors.
Interpretation: Due to many randomised studies investigating different risk factors that do not always coincide, breast cancer experts rely on a wide variety of criteria to recommend RNI for pN1(sn) breast cancer, leading to heterogeneity in decision-making. With this work we aim to raise awareness of this challenge to provoke revision of current guidelines and expert-based recommendations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111055 | DOI Listing |