Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: MRI-based whole-brain manual segmentation methods are considered the gold standard for brain volumetric analysis, but are time-consuming and prone to human error. Automated segmentation tools like FreeSurfer can identify differences in brain volumes between healthy and non-healthy individuals. Deep-learning-based segmentation tools, such as FastSurfer, offer faster processing times, but further validation is needed, particularly in pediatric cases. This study aims to compare FastSurfer with FreeSurfer in a pediatric cohort and compare the volume estimates with previously published reference values.
Methods: A multicenter cohort of 448 subjects aged 4-18 years from three centers was used to compare FastSurfer with FreeSurfer. Validation metrics, including the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), relative volume differences (RVD), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), were computed. Hemispheric asymmetries were assessed by calculating a hemispheric asymmetry index.
Findings: The segmentation methods demonstrated high agreement, with a mean DSC across subjects and regions of interest of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79; 0.95), RVD of 0.3% (95% CI: -7.6%; 7.4%), and ICC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.52; 0.94). After a visual inspection, which led to the exclusion of 12 subjects with segmentation errors, growth charts for relative volume estimates of 15 anatomical brain regions were generated, revealing varying growth patterns across ages. A potential clinical application is illustrated by plotting a patient's data on these growth charts, showing a specific atrophy pattern.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the use of FastSurfer in volumetric analysis of a pediatric population. Our findings suggest that FastSurfer is a reliable segmentation tool for pediatric data and is particularly promising for clinical practice due to its high accuracy despite rapid processing times. The morphometric data, growth charts, and code are publicly accessible.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277543 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70689 | DOI Listing |