A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Worldwide Prevalence of Radix Molaris in Mandibular Second Molars Assessed by Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the worldwide prevalence of radix entomolaris (RE) and paramolaris (RP) in mandibular second molars via cone beam computed tomography.

Methods: The electronic databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were searched using related MeSH keywords. In vivo cone-beam computed tomography-based studies that evaluated the prevalence of RE and RP in mandibular second molars were retrieved and assessed. The included studies were quantitatively analyzed via a meta-analysis to determine the pooled prevalence rates of RE and RP. Furthermore, the studies were qualitatively assessed using the Newcastle‒Ottawa quality assessment scale.

Results: Twenty-six studies were eligible for this review and a meta-analysis of 21,383 mandibular second molars was performed. All the studies involved were ranked as high quality with no evidence of publication bias. The global prevalence of RE was 0.72% (95% confidence interval: 0.45% to 1.04%) and that of RP was 0.17% (95% confidence interval: 0.004% to 0.36%). Sex and geographical location did not significantly influence RE or RP incidence.

Conclusion: The prevalence of radix molaris is not infrequent. The incidence of RE is higher than that of RP, and neither sex nor country influences the incidence rate of either presentation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.07.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mandibular second
16
second molars
16
prevalence radix
12
worldwide prevalence
8
radix molaris
8
cone beam
8
beam computed
8
review meta-analysis
8
95% confidence
8
confidence interval
8

Similar Publications