Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of synthetic hematocrit (Hct)-based myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) quantification using photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT late enhancement (LE) imaging, with cardiac MRI as the reference standard.
Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of a prospective study, patients underwent same-day cardiac MRI and PCD-CT LE imaging. MRI-based ECV (ECV) was computed using T1 mapping sequences before and after contrast administration. PCD-CT-based ECV (ECV) was calculated using synthetic Hct derived from blood pool attenuation in virtual non-contrast (VNC) images of LE scans. Agreement between ECV and ECV was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, Pearson correlation, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with absolute agreement. A linear regression model was applied to correct for systematic bias in ECV, generating bias-adjusted ECV values (ECV).
Results: A total of 27 patients (mean age 52.9 ± 17.2 years, 52 % female) were included. ECV systematically overestimated ECV (42.1 ± 8.7 % vs. 33.8 ± 8.1 %, p < 0.001), with a mean bias of -8.3 percentage points and wide limits of agreement (-7.3 to 23.9). Correlation between ECV and ECV was moderate (r = 0.56, p = 0.002), and ICC indicated poor reliability (ICC = 0.38). Bias correction using linear regression eliminated systematic error (ECV: 35.0 ± 4.8 %, p = 0.373), with a reduced mean bias of -1.2 percentage points, but wide limits of agreement remained (-14.4 to 12.1). ICC improved slightly to 0.51, indicating moderate reliability.
Conclusion: While synthetic Hct-based ECV estimation using PCD-CT is technically feasible, it systematically overestimates MRI-derived ECV and demonstrates considerable inter-individual variability. Bias correction effectively eliminates systematic error, but the improvement in variability remains limited.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112321 | DOI Listing |