98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To assess the effects of faricimab versus aflibercept on epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
Methods: Post hoc analysis of phase 3 YOSEMITE/RHINE trial data in eyes with DME receiving faricimab Q8W, faricimab treat-and-extend (T&E; up to Q16W depending on central subfield thickness [CST] and best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA]), or aflibercept Q8W for 100 weeks.
Results: ERMs developed in 3.8% (23/602) of eyes treated with faricimab Q8W, 5.1% (31/608) with faricimab T&E, and 7.6% (45/590) with aflibercept Q8W at 100 weeks. ERMs were less likely with faricimab Q8W versus aflibercept Q8W (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.81, P = 0.0055). Mean (SD) BCVA at 100 weeks in eyes with and without ERMs were 69.2 (13.6) letters [20/40 Snellen] versus 73.8 (13.1) [20/40 Snellen], respectively; mean (SD) CSTs were 315.8 (99.2) vs. 274.6 (74.1) µm. Faricimab T&E dosing intervals were extended ≥ Q12W in 79.7% of eyes without ERMs versus 50.0% with ERMs.
Conclusion: Risk of ERMs was 52% lower with faricimab Q8W versus aflibercept Q8W over 100 weeks in eyes with DME, suggesting a potential role for faricimab in reducing pre-retinal fibrotic proliferation. Results may help inform physician/patient decision-making when initiating intravitreal therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004572 | DOI Listing |
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
September 2025
Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address:
Aims: To evaluate the association between intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and lower extremity complications in diabetic eye disease (DED), and compare risks among ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a U.S.
Ophthalmol Ther
August 2025
The Retina Clinic London, 24 Queen Anne Street, London, W1G 9AX, UK.
Introduction: A 24-week phase 3 analysis previously demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable tolerability between candidate biosimilar CT-P42 and reference aflibercept in participants with diabetic macular edema. Here, we report long-term outcomes through week 52.
Methods: This was a randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, phase 3 international trial, conducted at 83 study centers across Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, India, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Republic of Korea, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, and Ukraine.
Ophthalmology
August 2025
Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, and School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changguan Hospital, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Purpose: To follow up the previously published comparison of aflibercept 8 mg at extended dosing intervals versus aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) through 48 weeks, we now report efficacy, durability and safety analyses through 96 weeks.
Design: PULSAR (NCT04423718): phase 3, randomized, non-inferiority, 96-week trial.
Participants: Treatment-naive adults aged ≥50 years with active, subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD.
Cureus
July 2025
Medical Retina Service, Western Eye Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Introduction A standard practice for addressing wet age-related macular degeneration (WetAMD) is to deliver anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections. Formulations with higher concentrations, such as aflibercept 8 mg (Eylea HD; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany), which are administered in larger volumes, may raise concerns about potential increases in intraocular pressure (IOP) and other ocular complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare short-term IOP changes following intravitreal injection of aflibercept 8 mg (Eylea HD, 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground/aims: To describe the functional outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) non-responsive to bevacizumab switched to ranibizumab or aflibercept over 1 year and the demographic and anatomic predictors of these functional outcomes.
Methods: In a retrospective real-world cohort study, 76 consecutive patients with DME non-responsive to bevacizumab were reviewed at baseline and 12 months after switch to ranibizumab or aflibercept. Visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography features such as central retinal thickness were assessed.