Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Immunotherapy is now standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM), where the most common targets are B cell maturation antigen, CD38, and G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D). However, additional novel targets are needed to counter tumor heterogeneity, therefore new strategies to identify additional targets are also required.
Methods: We utilized multi-omics data from two large datasets A framework that utilized prior knowledge of cell surface potential, expression in healthy organs, and expression level in MM cells was established to define novel immunotherapeutic targets. High confidence targets were prioritized for myeloma populations and subgroups, validated with flow cytometry and immunoblotting.
Results: Novel population-level candidate targets such as ITGA4 and LAX1, as well as subtype-specific targets including ROBO3 in t(4;14), CD109 in t(14;16), CD20 in t(11;14), CD180 in hyperdiploidy, GPRC5D in 1q gain, and ADAM28 in biallelic TP53 samples were identified. Candidate target surface expression was validated by flow cytometry and CRISPR-Cas9 knock-out models. Sub-clonal differences in expression were noted, using single-cell RNA-seq data. Additionally, alternative splicing of existing immunotherapy targets, such as FCRL5, was noted as a potential mechanism of antigen loss.
Conclusions: Our study presents a methodology to identify novel candidate immunotherapy targets. We also use known genomic data to identify subtype-specific targets that could be used either as complementary or alternative targets to existing treatments. We show that immunotherapy targets can have heterogenous expression within a patient, which can affect treatment efficacy. Taken together, our study establishes a robust methodology to identify novel therapeutic targets in MM, revealing critical insights that will inform the development of current and next-generation immunotherapies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12261794 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01503-y | DOI Listing |