98%
921
2 minutes
20
The long-term success of single-unit restorations is a key objective in restorative dentistry; however, failure rates remain significant due to multiple contributing factors, including inadequate tooth preparation, inappropriate material selection, bonding deficiencies, and occlusal mismanagement. This narrative review aimed to critically assess clinical studies and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024 that explored the biomechanical and occlusal determinants affecting the longevity of tooth-supported crowns. A structured search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, supplemented by manual reference screening. Observations from the literature highlight several influential risk factors such as loss of tooth vitality, improper occlusal adjustment, bruxism, and poor margin design. Additionally, finite element analysis studies were reviewed to understand how material properties and preparation geometry influence stress distribution and fatigue. These findings highlight how small, well-considered decisions like refining occlusal contacts, choosing the right material, or adjusting the preparation design can make a meaningful difference in preventing complications. By drawing from the current evidence, this review reinforces the value of thoughtful, evidence-based clinical practices and points to specific areas where further research could help make single-unit restorations more reliable and long-lasting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12258076 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.85998 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2025
Department of Orthodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, IND.
Background Accurate impressions are essential for the long-term success of implant-supported restorations. Both conventional and digital techniques are routinely used in clinical implantology, each with its own advantages and limitations. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the precision of digital and conventional implant impressions and compare the marginal fit of crowns obtained from digital impressions and those obtained from conventional impressions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: This scoping review describes the current evidence on immediate implant placement (IIP) and immediate restoration (IR) in single-unit and multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses regarding anatomical, surgical, and prosthetic factors.
Materials And Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for systematic reviews on IIP and IR in the anterior and posterior regions of the jaws. Bibliometric data and study details were extracted.
The Oral Reconstruction Foundation organized the International Expert Meeting (IEM) on January 24 to 25, 2025, in Malaga, Spain, inviting expert academicians and clinicians with the aim of establishing clinical recommendations for practitioners on two current topics of interest: (1) immediate implant placement and restorations in single-unit and multiunit FDPs-current evidence, indications, clinical protocols, and (2) immediate implant placement and restorations in full-arch situations-indications and limitations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Prosthet Dent
August 2025
Adjunct Professor, Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia (UV), Valencia, Spain.
Statement Of Problem: Gingival recession is one of the most common complications following prosthetic treatment. However, scientific evidence addressing this periodontal behavior in patients treated with the biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) is lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the periodontal outcomes on teeth prepared with the BOPT over a 2-year follow-up period, assessed by using digital technologies.
Biomimetics (Basel)
June 2025
Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, "Vasile Goldiș" Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania.
Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the adhesive performance of zirconia and lithium disilicate Maryland cantilever restorations on prepared and non-prepared anterior abutment teeth. While conventional clinical protocols involve abutment tooth preparation, no-preparation (no-prep) restorations have emerged as a viable, minimally invasive alternative. This study compared the adhesion fracture resistance (N) of zirconia restorations on non-prepared enamel surfaces with those on prepared surfaces exposing the dentin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF