A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Effect of Different File Motions on the Formation of Apical Debris During Root Canal Preparation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The formation of apical debris is a common occurrence during root canal preparation, which may cause postoperative complications like pain and infection. Different file motions-rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive-can influence the extent of debris extrusion.

Materials And Methods: A total of 90 extracted single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into three groups ( = 30) based on the file motion used: Group 1-rotary, Group 2-reciprocating, and Group 3-adaptive motion. All teeth were standardized to a working length of 18 mm, and canals were prepared using a crown-down technique with a size #25 file at the apex. The extruded debris was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes, dried, and weighed again to determine the amount of debris. The preparation time for each file system was also recorded.

Results: The mean weight of apical debris (in mg) was as follows: 0.62 ± 0.05 mg, 0.82 ± 0.07 mg, and 0.48 ± 0.04 mg. The adaptive motion files produced significantly less debris than rotary and reciprocating files ( < 0.05). The reciprocating group showed the highest amount of apical debris. There was no significant difference in preparation time among the three groups.

Conclusion: File motion has a significant effect on the formation of apical debris during root canal preparation. Adaptive motion files resulted in the least debris extrusion, while reciprocating files caused the highest amount of debris. These findings highlight the importance of choosing an appropriate file motion to minimize apical debris and reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244573PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1694_24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

apical debris
24
formation apical
12
debris
12
root canal
12
canal preparation
12
file motion
12
debris root
8
postoperative complications
8
amount debris
8
preparation time
8

Similar Publications