A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The Effect of Different File Motions on the Formation of Apical Debris During Root Canal Preparation . | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: After root canal preparation, apical debris may cause discomfort and delayed healing. Rotary, reciprocating, and adaptive file movements affect debris extrusion.

Materials And Methods: Sixty extracted mandibular premolars with single root canals were randomly divided into three file motion groups (n = 20): Group A (rotary motion using ProTaper Universal files), Group B (reciprocating motion using WaveOne files), and Group C (adaptive motion using TF Adaptive files). Extruded debris was collected in Eppendorf tubes with teeth. Standard watering techniques prepared root canals. Drying and weighing extruded debris with a 0.0001 g analytical balance detected apical debris.

Results: The average weight of extruded debris in Group A (rotary) was 0.120 ± 0.005 g, Group B (reciprocating) was 0.180 ± 0.008 g, and Group C (adaptive motion) was 0.140 ± 0.006 g. One-way ANOVA analysis showed significant differences across groups ( < 0.05). The rotating motion extruded the least apical debris, whereas reciprocating action generated the most.

Conclusion: File movements greatly affect apical debris production during root canal preparation. Apical debris is lowest with rotary motion, followed by adaptive and reciprocating motion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244830PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1925_24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

apical debris
20
root canal
12
canal preparation
12
extruded debris
12
debris
9
preparation apical
8
file movements
8
root canals
8
motion
8
group rotary
8

Similar Publications