Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Stiff-Knee gait (SKG) is a common post-stroke impairment, marked by insufficient knee flexion during the swing phase, which reduces toe clearance, increases fall risk, and requires compensatory movements that can have adverse biomechanical effects. To address muscle weakness and paresis in SKG, assistive technologies, such as functional electrical stimulation (FES) and robotic exoskeletons, have been introduced. However, robotic assistance may inadvertently increase spinal reflex excitability by activating muscle stretch receptors, potentially worsening SKG. Previous studies suggest that SKG may stem from quadriceps hyperreflexia, particularly in the rectus femoris (RF) muscle. As such, assistive interventions could exacerbate, rather than alleviate, this condition via artificial activation of stretch receptors. In this study, we examined the impact of two FES modalities, plantarflexor and knee flexor assistance, on RF reflex excitability at rest and during gait in six post-stroke individuals with SKG. Results showed that, at rest, plantarflexor FES facilitated the RF reflex excitability, while knee flexor FES led to a slight inhibition. During gait, we observed that some individuals exhibited changes in reflex excitability during FES, but this effect was not as consistent as during rest. These preliminary results suggest that assistive technology such as FES modulates reflex excitability dependent on context.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICORR66766.2025.11063094 | DOI Listing |