A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Usefulness of the AHEAD score for prediction of all-cause death in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score was developed to predict all-cause death (ACD) in patients with heart failure. However, its predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS score in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown.

Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data of the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. The AHEAD score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for atrial fibrillation, anemia, age >70 years, elevated creatinine levels (>130 μmol/L), and diabetes mellitus.

Results: In total, 9033 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2019. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that both the AHEAD and CHADS scores were independently associated with ACD in patients with ACS and CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.70-2.14] for ACS and 1.72 [1.54-1.92] for CCS, and HR 1.17 [1.06-1.29] for ACS and 1.18 [1.08-1.29] for CCS, respectively). However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the AHEAD score had a significantly higher predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS score in both ACS and CCS. A significant difference was found in the rate of ACD among patients stratified by the AHEAD score in both groups.

Conclusions: The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12242462PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200457DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ahead score
20
acd patients
12
predictive acd
12
acd compared
12
compared chads
12
chads score
12
acs ccs
12
all-cause death
8
patients
8
chronic coronary
8

Similar Publications