Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score was developed to predict all-cause death (ACD) in patients with heart failure. However, its predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS score in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown.
Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed data of the patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) using the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. The AHEAD score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for atrial fibrillation, anemia, age >70 years, elevated creatinine levels (>130 μmol/L), and diabetes mellitus.
Results: In total, 9033 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2019. Cox multivariate analysis revealed that both the AHEAD and CHADS scores were independently associated with ACD in patients with ACS and CCS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.70-2.14] for ACS and 1.72 [1.54-1.92] for CCS, and HR 1.17 [1.06-1.29] for ACS and 1.18 [1.08-1.29] for CCS, respectively). However, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the AHEAD score had a significantly higher predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS score in both ACS and CCS. A significant difference was found in the rate of ACD among patients stratified by the AHEAD score in both groups.
Conclusions: The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12242462 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200457 | DOI Listing |