A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Spirometry to predict dry powder inhaler performance: Insights from in-check DIAL. | LitMetric

Spirometry to predict dry powder inhaler performance: Insights from in-check DIAL.

Respir Med

Pulmonology Department Unidade Local de Saúde Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.

Published: September 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management involves pharmacologic therapy delivered via inhalers. Choosing the right inhaler can be challenging. The In-Check Dial G16®, designed as a training device, helps clinicians assess inspiratory capacity by simulating inhaler resistance but can be time-consuming. Spirometry quantitatively assesses lung function and is essential for COPD diagnosis. This study explores spirometry as a predictive tool for assessing the inspiratory flow required for dry powder inhalers (DPI).

Methods: We included COPD patients using inhalers for at least one month who underwent spirometry in two Portuguese hospitals. On the same day, patients' inhalatory capacity was evaluated with the In-Check DIAL G16®. Patients were considered able to use the DPI if they could achieve a flow higher than 30 L/min at least three times at the R3 resistance level.

Results: Ninety-one patients enrolled, most using pressurized metered-dose inhaler/soft mist inhalers (37.4 %), low resistance (30.8 %), medium-low resistance (23.1 %), and medium resistance (8.8 %) inhalers. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) best predicted DPI use, with a cut-off value of 3.10 L/s providing 69.2 % sensitivity and 76.9 % specificity. Forced inspiratory flow at 50% of FVC (FIF) was the second-best predictor, with a cut-off value of 2.91 L/s, 63.7 % sensitivity, and 69.2 % specificity.

Conclusion: PIF's strong correlation with inhalation capacity underlines spirometry's importance in COPD evaluations. Identified PIF and FIF cut-off values assist clinicians in selecting appropriate inhalers. Spirometry offers a more accessible and time-efficient alternative to the In-Check Dial G16®, warranting further research to validate these findings and integrate spirometry-based assessments into COPD management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2025.108249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

in-check dial
16
dial g16®
12
inspiratory flow
12
dry powder
8
copd management
8
inhalers
6
spirometry
5
copd
5
resistance
5
spirometry predict
4

Similar Publications