A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

STIMFIX™ anchoring in percutaneous spinal cord stimulation trials: interim analysis of a multicenter study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Lead migration during percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trials can undermine therapeutic efficacy. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the novel, noninvasive STIMFIX anchoring system in reducing lead migration compared to conventional anchoring techniques.

Patients & Methods: This interim analysis included two prospectively collected cohorts. Group 1 ( = 28) was a randomized, single-center trial comparing three anchoring methods: sutures ( = 9), adhesive tape ( = 10), and manufacturer-provided anchors ( = 9). Group 2 ( = 20) was a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized study using STIMFIX anchors. Lead migration was measured via standardized fluoroscopic imaging on Days 1 and 7.

Results: Mean lead migration in Group 1 was 33.5 mm (manufacturer anchor), 29.4 mm (tape), and 21.1 mm (sutures), with no significant differences between groups ( = 0.404). Group 2 demonstrated an average lead migration of 19.5 mm with STIMFIX. No major adverse events were reported; one case of minor skin irritation resolved without intervention.

Conclusions: STIMFIX demonstrated reduced lead migration compared to conventional methods, with favorable safety and ease of application. These findings support its use as a promising advancement in SCS trial anchoring.

Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05651646.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320872PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2527576DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lead migration
24
percutaneous spinal
8
spinal cord
8
cord stimulation
8
interim analysis
8
migration compared
8
compared conventional
8
lead
6
migration
6
stimfix™ anchoring
4

Similar Publications