A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Development and validation of an improved volumetric breast density estimation model using the ResNet technique. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

. Temporal changes in volumetric breast density (VBD) may serve as prognostic biomarkers for predicting the risk of future breast cancer development. However, accurately measuring VBD from archived x-ray mammograms remains challenging. In a previous study, we proposed a method to estimate volumetric breast density using imaging parameters (tube voltage, tube current, and exposure time) and patient age. This approach, based on a multiple regression model, achieved a determination coefficient (R) of 0.868.. In this study, we developed and applied machine learning models-Random Forest, XG-Boost-and the deep learning model Residual Network (ResNet) to the same dataset. Model performance was assessed using several metrics: determination coefficient, correlation coefficient, root mean square error, mean absolute error, root mean square percentage error, and mean absolute percentage error. A five-fold cross-validation was conducted to ensure robust validation.. The best-performing fold resulted in Rvalues of 0.895, 0.907, and 0.918 for Random Forest, XG-Boost, and ResNet, respectively, all surpassing the previous study's results. ResNet consistently achieved the lowest error values across all metrics.. These findings suggest that ResNet successfully achieved the task of accurately determining VBD from past mammography-a task that has not been realised to date. We are confident that this achievement contributes to advancing research aimed at predicting future risks of breast cancer development by enabling high-accuracy time-series analyses of retrospective VBD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adecacDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

volumetric breast
12
breast density
12
breast cancer
8
cancer development
8
determination coefficient
8
root square
8
error absolute
8
percentage error
8
breast
5
resnet
5

Similar Publications