A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Noninvasive quantification of aortic wave reflection timing indices in aging: a study combining MRI and applanation tonometry. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To study associations of newly proposed noninvasive central arterial wave reflection timing indices with age and reference indices of reflection magnitude, using superimposed MRI aortic flow and applanation tonometry carotid pressure waveforms.

Methods: Consecutively acquired MRI flow and tonometry pressure waveforms were superimposed in 113 volunteers [56 women, age: 43 ± 16 (19-81) years] free from overt cardiovascular disease except for hypertension, after registration and interpolation to averaged cardiac cycle duration using a custom interface to derive time to peak flow ( TQmax ) and pressure ( TPmax ). Conventional time to return of reflected pressure wave ( Ti ), augmentation index (AIx) and reflection magnitude (RM) were further measured and used as reference.

Results: TQmax occurred slightly earlier, whereas TPmax appeared later in the cardiac cycle with age, resulting in significant, independent age-related decrease in TQmax to Ti ( r  = -0.63, P  < 0.0001) and increase in TQmax to TPmax ( r  = 0.61, P  < 0.0001) delays. Such delays were further significantly and independently related to reference AIx ( Ti  -  TQmax : r  = -0.66, P  < 0.0001; TPmax  -  TQmax : r  = 0.78, P  < 0.0001) and RM ( Ti  -  TQmax : r  = -0.55, P  < 0.0001; TPmax  -  TQmax : r  = 0.76, P  < 0.0001). Correlations obtained with TPmax  -  TQmax were overall higher than those obtained with conventional Ti timing (age: r  = -0.52, P  < 0.0001; AIx: r  = -0.77, P  < 0.0001; RM: r  = -0.42, P  < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Combination of noninvasive flow and pressure time domain waveforms was able to reliably capture central wave reflection timing indices as demonstrated by strong and independent associations with age and gold standard measures of reflection magnitude. Such timing, which was based on straightforward peaks detection, could be used to explore and better understand left ventricular-aortic coupling in cardiovascular conditions presenting increased reflections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000004088DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wave reflection
8
reflection timing
8
timing indices
8
applanation tonometry
8
reflection magnitude
8
cardiac cycle
8
noninvasive quantification
4
quantification aortic
4
aortic wave
4
reflection
4

Similar Publications