Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Urinary tract dilation (UTD) is a frequent problem in infants. Automated and objective classification of UTD from renal ultrasounds would streamline their interpretations.
Objective: To develop and evaluate the performance of different deep learning models in predicting UTD classifications from renal ultrasound images.
Materials And Methods: We searched our image archive to identify renal ultrasounds performed in infants ≤ 3-months-old for the clinical indications of prenatal UTD and urinary tract infection (9/2023-8/2024). An expert pediatric uroradiologist provided the ground truth UTD labels for representative sagittal sonographic renal images. Three different deep learning models trained with cross-entropy loss were adapted with four-fold cross-validation experiments to determine the overall performance.
Results: Our curated database included 492 right and 487 left renal ultrasounds (mean age ± standard deviation = 1.2 ± 0.1 months for both cohorts, with 341 boys/151 girls and 339 boys/148 girls, respectively). The model prediction accuracies for the right and left kidneys were 88.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], [85.8%, 91.5%]) and 80.5% (95% CI, [77.6%, 82.9%]), with weighted kappa scores of 0.90 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.91]) and 0.87 (95% CI, [0.82, 0.92]), respectively. When predictions were binarized into mild (normal/P1) and severe (UTD P2/P3) dilation, accuracies of the right and left kidneys increased to 96.3% (95% CI, [94.9%, 97.8%]) and 91.3% (95% CI, [88.5%, 94.2%]), but agreements decreased to 0.78 (95% CI, [0.73, 0.82]) and 0.75 (95% CI, [0.68, 0.82]), respectively.
Conclusion: Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy and agreement in classifying UTD from infant renal ultrasounds, supporting their potential as decision-support tools in clinical workflows.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06311-5 | DOI Listing |