A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Caliceal Diverticular Calculi? | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common treatment for caliceal diverticular calculi and provides excellent stone-free outcomes. Because of a concern for urinary stasis in the setting of a dilated nephrostomy tract, an indwelling ureteral stent and/or nephrostomy tube (NT) was traditionally left in the collecting system. The rationale for investigating totally tubeless PCNL (tt-PCNL) for the treatment of caliceal diverticula was to determine whether the advantages attributed to tt-PCNL for normal collecting system stones, such as shorter hospital stay and reduced morbidity, would extend to PCNL of caliceal diverticula. We describe our experience with tt-PCNL for caliceal diverticula, where patients typically go home the same day without any tube. We identified 42 patients (21 tt-PCNL, 21 PCNL with a NT and/or stent [t-PCNL]) with caliceal diverticular calculi undergoing PCNL from 2013 to 2024 in our prospectively maintained PCNL database. Demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative data were compared. Outcomes included final stone-free rate (SFR) using the absolute (0 mm) and relative (≤2 mm, 2.1-4 mm) fragment cutoffs, diverticular cavity resolution, 30-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and phone calls. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and continuous variables with Mann-Whitney tests. Demographics and stone characteristics were similar between groups. SFRs were 94% for tt-PCNL and 90% for t-PCNL ( = 0.910) using CT-based criteria, with effective diverticular resolution in 90% and 100% of cases, respectively ( = 0.480). Complications, all Clavien-Dindo grade 1, occurred in four tt-PCNL patients and in one t-PCNL patient ( = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates, 30-day complication and ED visit rates, or in the incidence of phone calls within 7 days. tt-PCNL patients were discharged same day, whereas t-PCNL required overnight observation. tt-PCNL is a safe effective option for caliceal diverticular stones, offering similar SFRs and safety outcomes compared with t-PCNL, but with shorter hospital stays.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0783DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

caliceal diverticular
16
caliceal diverticula
12
totally tubeless
8
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
8
option caliceal
8
treatment caliceal
8
diverticular calculi
8
collecting system
8
tt-pcnl
8
shorter hospital
8

Similar Publications