Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Although questionnaire-based surveys enable pharmacists to systematically assess patient needs, healthcare practices, and medication outcomes, it is essential to minimize various biases to ensure that the data obtained from surveys are both reliable and valid. The present study aimed to elucidate whether a workshop on questionnaire-based surveys could enhance research awareness and motivation among community and hospital pharmacists in Mie prefecture.
Methods: The workshop comprised three parts: lecture (15 min), group work (90 min), and presentation (60 min). The participants' awareness and motivation for questionnaire-based survey was assessed through a questionnaire before and after the workshop, focusing on three questions. A customer satisfaction analysis was also conducted to identify areas for improvement in workshops on questionnaire-based surveys for future workshops.
Results: Response rate of the questionnaire was 100% (16/16 participants). In the question 1 "I think that it would be beneficial to conduct a questionnaire-based survey on daily tasks and present the findings at conferences or publish them in academic journals", no respondents answered "Disagree" when asked after workshop. In the question 2 "I would like to conduct a questionnaire-based survey if there is a specific theme", the proportions of respondents selecting "Neutral" (p = 0.027) and "Somewhat disagree" (p = 0.001) also decreased after workshop, and all participants responded with either "Agree" or "Somewhat agree." In the question 3 "I think that I can independently design a research project about questionnaire-based survey.", the proportion of respondents who selected "Agree" significantly increased from 6.3% before-workshop to 25% after-workshop (p = 0.003). The customer satisfaction graph revealed that only "Understanding of the lecture" was located in the priority maintenance area. On the other hand, "Time allocation of the presentation" and "Usefulness of the mentor" were located in the priority improvement area.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that a workshop for questionnaire-based surveys enhanced research awareness and motivation among community and hospital pharmacists. Increasing the time allocated for discussions among participants was suggested to enhance participant satisfaction and potentially influence their understanding and skills in questionnaire-based surveys.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219599 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-025-00460-3 | DOI Listing |