Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
IntroductionProton therapy minimizes damage to healthy tissues while effectively targeting tumors. However, uncertainties in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) calculations remain a challenge, particularly for critical organs at risk (OARs), such as the brainstem and spinal cord. This study introduces ensemble RBE models (eRBE-B and eRBE-SC) developed through a meta-synthesis (MS) approach to improve dose accuracy and stability in proton radiotherapy.Materials and MethodsA systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines identified studies utilizing variable RBE models. The MS approach aggregates data on model usage patterns and study quality due to the lack of direct RBE measurements. Three primary models (Carabe, Wedenberg, and McNamara) were weighted on the basis of study quality and case counts to construct ensemble RBE models. Dose calculations and analysis were performed via RayStation 8B, MCsquare, and 3D Slicer.ResultsCompared with the Carabe model, the eRBE-B model resulted in reduced dose underestimation, with mean dose () and maximum dose () differences of -0.89 Gy (-1.44%) and -1.08 Gy (-1.61%), respectively. For the brainstem, eRBE-B closely aligned with the McNamara model, yielding and values of 9.88 Gy and 64.07 Gy, respectively. Ensemble models demonstrated enhanced consistency and stability across critical OARs, mitigating biases inherent in single-model approaches.ConclusionEnsemble RBE models offer a robust alternative to standalone models in proton therapy. By aggregating published RBE data, the MS approach enhances dose precision for critical organs, improving the safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy. These findings underscore the potential of computational tools to optimize treatment planning for head and neck cancer patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12217569 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748251355396 | DOI Listing |