Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) leads to a nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) in approximately 70% of breast cancer patients, especially in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative subtypes. However, sentinel lymph node (SLN)-mapping after NAC remains challenging due to lower identification and higher false-negative rates compared with early-stage breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal SLN-mapping approach after NAC.
Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 270 patients with breast cancer receiving NAC between May 2021 and July 2024 and randomized them (1:1:1) to arm A (radioisotope [RI] + indocyanine green fluorescence [ICG-F]), arm B (RI + vital dye [indigo carmine]), and arm C (ICG-F + vital dye). The primary outcome of SLN-identification rate and the secondary outcome of SLN-operation time were analyzed.
Result: Interim results showed SLN-identification rates of 95% in arm A, 92% in arm B, and 79% in arm C, with a significant difference between arms A and C (0.1597; p = 0.0055). The final analysis comparing only arms A and B showed SLN-identification rates of 92.6% (100/108) and 90.6% (96/106), respectively (p = 0.2967), with a significantly shorter mean time to first SLN detection in arm B than in arm A (7 vs. 8 min; p = 0.0046). The intra-arm detection rates differed significantly: arm A (RI, 96.0%; ICG-F, 92.0%; p = 0.232) versus arm B (RI, 97.9%; vital dye, 72.9%; p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Multimodal SLN-mapping demonstrated high post-NAC identification rates without significant intra-arm differences in the SLN-identification rates, whereas SLN-detection rates differed by the method for each arm. For patients with breast cancer, RI + ICG-F SLN-mapping is an effective dual-method post-NAC approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17740-9 | DOI Listing |