A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Clinical Application of Multimodal Sentinel Lymph Node-Mapping Method for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Final Analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) leads to a nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) in approximately 70% of breast cancer patients, especially in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative subtypes. However, sentinel lymph node (SLN)-mapping after NAC remains challenging due to lower identification and higher false-negative rates compared with early-stage breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal SLN-mapping approach after NAC.

Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 270 patients with breast cancer receiving NAC between May 2021 and July 2024 and randomized them (1:1:1) to arm A (radioisotope [RI] + indocyanine green fluorescence [ICG-F]), arm B (RI + vital dye [indigo carmine]), and arm C (ICG-F + vital dye). The primary outcome of SLN-identification rate and the secondary outcome of SLN-operation time were analyzed.

Result: Interim results showed SLN-identification rates of 95% in arm A, 92% in arm B, and 79% in arm C, with a significant difference between arms A and C (0.1597; p = 0.0055). The final analysis comparing only arms A and B showed SLN-identification rates of 92.6% (100/108) and 90.6% (96/106), respectively (p = 0.2967), with a significantly shorter mean time to first SLN detection in arm B than in arm A (7 vs. 8 min; p = 0.0046). The intra-arm detection rates differed significantly: arm A (RI, 96.0%; ICG-F, 92.0%; p = 0.232) versus arm B (RI, 97.9%; vital dye, 72.9%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Multimodal SLN-mapping demonstrated high post-NAC identification rates without significant intra-arm differences in the SLN-identification rates, whereas SLN-detection rates differed by the method for each arm. For patients with breast cancer, RI + ICG-F SLN-mapping is an effective dual-method post-NAC approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17740-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
20
patients breast
12
vital dye
12
sln-identification rates
12
arm
11
sentinel lymph
8
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
8
final analysis
8
multimodal sln-mapping
8
rates differed
8

Similar Publications